EPAM Systems vs Infosys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) edges ahead of Infosys (4.0/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for enterprises wanting AI advisory paired directly with engineering delivery. Infosys is the stronger option for global enterprises needing AI advisory inside a full IT services contract. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 1981 |
| HQ | Newtown, United States | Bengaluru, India |
| Team size | 62,000+ | 330,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy advisory model that pairs strategists with the actual build team | One of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based advisory arm |
| Pricing model | Retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting | Retainer, enterprise contracting |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Python, AWS, Azure | Python, AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment | Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Telecom |
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was co-founded in 1993 in New Jersey and Minsk by Arkadiy Dobkin and Leo Lozner, and has traded on the NYSE as an S&P 500 constituent since 2012. It employed roughly 62,850 people across more than 55 countries at the end of 2025. AI advisory and transformation engineering runs as a marketed practice across the firm, distinguished from pure Big Four strategy firms by EPAM's engineering-heavy delivery model: advisors sit alongside the technical staff who actually build what gets recommended.
Infosys
Infosys was founded in 1981 and is headquartered in Bengaluru, India, employing approximately 330,429 people worldwide as of March 2026. It runs a full suite of enterprise AI advisory services, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Infosys Consulting, founded in 2004 and headquartered in London, adds a dedicated strategy arm separate from the parent's much larger delivery organization.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Machine learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer | Retainer, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce | Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce |
| Best use cases | Running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move directly into technical build with the same team., Needing a publicly-traded agency for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract., Needing a globally recognized agency for board-level procurement approval. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Retainer |
EPAM Systems vs Infosys: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company financial disclosure that no privately held agency on this list can match. |
| + | The engineering-heavy delivery model avoids the strategy-to-build handoff gap common at pure advisory firms. |
| + | Enough scale to staff several large AI advisory and build programs across regions at once. |
| + | S&P 500 membership lets enterprise procurement teams vet the firm through standard due diligence. |
| - | AI advisory sits inside an enormous engineering business rather than functioning as a dedicated specialty |
| - | Enterprise scale generally means slower onboarding and a higher minimum engagement than boutique agencies |
| Infosys | |
|---|---|
| + | Massive global scale, 330,000-plus employees, supports the largest enterprise AI programs. |
| + | The dedicated Infosys Consulting subsidiary adds a London-based advisory layer. |
| + | Four decades of operating history and deep enterprise procurement relationships. |
| + | Cloud and enterprise software partnerships span multiple platforms, reducing lock-in. |
| - | AI advisory is one part of an enormous general IT services business, not a specialized focus |
| - | Scale generally means slower engagement setup than smaller, more agile agencies |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move directly into technical build with the same team.
An engineering-heavy advisory model that pairs strategists with the actual build team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Infosys?
A typical fit: running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract.
One of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based advisory arm. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail & e-commerce, Telecom.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) vs Infosys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Infosys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running an AI strategy engagement that needs to move directly into technical build with the same team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Needing a publicly-traded agency for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Running an AI advisory initiative as part of a much larger enterprise IT services contract. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Needing a globally recognized agency for board-level procurement approval. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price project | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated team model | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Infosys
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Consulting projects. An engineering-heavy advisory model that pairs strategists with the actual build team.
Infosys (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need needing a globally recognized agency for board-level procurement approval. If your situation matches that, Infosys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Infosys FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Infosys?
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company financial disclosure that no privately held agency on this list can match. Infosys's strongest advantage: massive global scale, 330,000-plus employees, supports the largest enterprise AI programs.
How do EPAM Systems and Infosys differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting pricing. Infosys uses retainer, enterprise contracting pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Infosys?
Infosys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Infosys?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy advisory model that pairs strategists with the actual build team. Infosys's primary differentiator is: one of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based advisory arm. They also differ in team size (62,000+ vs 330,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Financial services, Manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.